 |
WilsonWeeflerunR said about Encrypted A.I.: I think the deck is rather light on ice (only 14). Also you use 4 Encoder, Inc. and only 10 Code Gates. You could benefit more from the Encoders by using more Ball and Chains. I am not a fan of the 2 Reschedulers in the deck or the Namatoki Plaza. The Reschedulers use actions that could be spent more wisely and they do not guarantee a 'better' draw. Also the agenda's you use in the deck have quite a high difficulty, which gives the runner more opportunities to score them before you can.
But thanks for sharing the deck.
Greetz.
|
11/17/2011
|
 |
cannon said about Breaker Recycling: Thanks for the heads-up, I guess I should have taken a closer look at the rulings for that particular card. That's more than a little disappointing, but at least I know now before I play the deck against someone. Back to the drawing board...
|
01/22/2011
|
 |
WormholeSurfer said about Breaker Recycling: Hi and Welcome, i'm sad to tell you that your deck doesn't work, Joan of arc protect a programm from beeing trashed from one special "trash" effect but each time you use Rent i Con it generates a trash effect separate for each time you use it. So if you use Rent only for one sub it works but not more ...
Sorry ...
|
01/22/2011
|
 |
7OOTnegaTerces said about Phobos and Deimos: Of course, part of the idea behind it is that this deck is supposed to win fairly quickly (though not as quick as it once was able to with two Tycho's...), meanwhile the Runner has to deal with both the damage and the tags given by TRAP! while trying to steal the agendas...
Still though, I figured bankrupters would be a problem, but I was wondering if there might be anyway to counteract that, some what, at least for the TagMe style bankrupters, who are just asking for it...
|
09/30/2010
|